NUCLEAR POWER MUST BE INCREASED QUICKLY
As a result of the rapidly
increasing natural gas prices, a consortium of energy companies, including
Chicago-based Exelon Corp., the owner of the most nuclear plants, is laying the
groundwork for building the nation’s first nuclear power plant since the
Each
of the 103 operating nuclear plants in the
A critical analysis of the
DOE’s own data indicates that there well be a rapid decline in the gas supply
and that the shortages of gas will come much too soon and be too steep for us
to fill the energy void. To make matters
even worse, that decline in gas production will be occurring simultaneously
with the decline of world oil. Adding to
the problem of increasing nuclear power is that no new nuclear plants will be
approved by the National Nuclear Regulatory Agency until the $8-billion-dollar,
1000-foot-deep, 6-mile-long,
Even
though no new
The
average amount of uranium in the earth’s crust is between 3 and 4 grams per ton
of rock. And even though in many
deposits the concentration is very low, the economically workable deposits
discovered thus far are large but not infinite.
I have heard estimates of the uranium reserves that have ranged anywhere
from 30 years to 200 years. I do not
know if that large spread in years is caused by differences in what is
considered economically extractable uranium or on differing estimates of the
future demand. The
Even though nuclear fuel may
be in a reactor for several years, when it is removed, only a small percentage
of it fissionable atoms will have been spent.
The nuclear fuel must be removed with much of its fissile content still
unused. This is because radiation damage
to the element tends to cause physical distortion and because the fission
products soak up neutrons and tend to “put out” the reaction
The spent fuel that is removed from the reactors has value because of its uranium-235 content. In addition to the still fissionable uranium-235 in the spent fuel, some of he non-fissionable uranium-238 will have been converted into fissionable plutonium-239, most of which will remain in he spent fuel without undergoing fission.
Because only a small percentage of the fuel’s fissile atoms will have been spent in the used fuel, instead of placing that fuel in the depository, it should be reprocessed for reuse. The downside to this reprocessing is that it will also produce plutonium, which can be used to produce nuclear weapons. The only safe answer to this great potential danger is to have all the production and enrichment of the world’s nuclear fuels performed by a single international nuclear agency. If the fuel is not reprocessed, the time will eventually come when there will be a peaking of the world’s extractable uranium-235 supply. Because the workable uranium-235 deposits are not infinite, its production will eventually follow Dr. M. King Hubbert’s bell-shaped curve.
If our energy-dependent
industrial society is not to enter into an endless age of misery and
starvation, it is essential that safe nuclear power rapidly becomes an
increasingly important source of that energy that is now being provided by
fossil fuels. However, nuclear energy
has a serious lead-time problem, partly caused by the DOE’s politically driven
forecasts of an ample future gas supply.
It is largely because of the DOE’s grossly optimistic forecasts of the nation’s future
supply of oil and gas that the